Bob Iger Confirms Chewbacca for the New Han Solo Movie.
During the Deutsche Bank 2016 Media, Internet & Telecom Conference held on Tuesday, Disney’s chief Bob Iger revealed the expected news that Chewbacca will appear in Phil Lord’s and Chris Miller’s stand-alone movie based on Han Solo…
From TheWrap:
Due in 2018, the film will explore Han and Chewy’s origin story. Disney chief Bob Iger talked “Star Wars” during his time at the conference, confirming that Chewbacca would appear in the new Han Solo standalone movie being directed by Phil Lord and Chris Miller.
“We have others in the works, including one, which is an origin story about Han Solo and Chewy,” he continued. “And that’ll come after ‘Star Wars 8’ in 2018. And then there’ll be possibly be more thereafter.”
He also briefly spoke about the upcoming release of Rogue One, again confirming the main plot of the movie and that it takes place right before the events in A New Hope.
Another interesting thing he said, was that the stand alone movies will be marketed differently from the regular episodes, but “aggressively”.
This announcement makes you wonder if Iger unintentionally just spoiled Peter Mayhew’s special announcement, teased by the actor a few weeks ago.
Founder of SWNN, MNN and The Cantina forums.
Born on April 24, 1980.
Chewie’s not the problem, Han is. But again, if they manage to do everything so good that the fact that Han looks different isn’t that hurting, I’m okay for it. But they have to make it the best star wars movie ever
“But they have to make it the best star wars movie ever”
Why?
I’d say that should be the aim of every Star Wars movie.
Attack of the Clones fell pretty short of the mark didn’t it.
It did, but even I can find joy in the prequels. The Darth Maul character was cool however underused. It was a pretty good though overly flashy lightsaber battle. AotC was okay with the Jedi and Clone battle. RotS was the best prequel in my opinion, though not on par with the originals.
Still though, it should be the goal to make the best movie possible, if enough time and money is spent. As they say, anything worth doing is worth doing well, and that should be the end goal. Bash the prequels, but understand that many people worked very hard on them, though they did miss the mark.
Yeah I know. I am being a bit harsh. If I want to watch a really bad film I watch AvP2.
Or AVP1…I loved the logic. The room/pyramid was changing every 10 minutes they figured out because they used the metric system??? How does that work?
I’m a huge fan of films and can be a very tolerant viewer. I seem to enjoy films that a lot of people deride, hell, I even enjoyed Battlefield Earth… kind of. How such terrible films such as AvP2 get made is beyond me.
It’s obvious: Somebody came up with that great scene in the maternity ward and realized it was too good an idea to let slip away. They, unfortunately, didn’t bother to come up with anything good leading up to or following that scene.
I did say that it should be the “aim” to be the best, and there are many who feel that they fell short of the mark. Although like any art form good/bad/indifferent feelings towards the finished thing are purely subjective.
They are not as good as the OT (in my opinion), but like Darth Necris I can enjoy them.
to balance out the absence of Harrison Ford
it doesn’t have to be the best star wars movie, it has to be a good and fun movie that rapresent well the character of Hano Solo, that’s enough for me
yeah, but average star wars fans will hate it if it is just an ok star wars film, because Han Solo isn’t played by harrison Ford and probably whoever plays the character won’t be similar enpugh in appearance.
What’s important is the story and Han’s character — looks are secondary.
In fact, perhaps the best tell here would be if they had Harrison Ford give the script a read. If it’s good enough for Ford, then that’s half the issue solved right there. Then again, having Ford be their script green-lighter would probably be rather taxing, seeing as Ford is only just now getting clear of this stuff.
I’m there with you. Though I have issues with a Han Solo recast, I know it is not possible for him to play himself minus 40 or so years. I had the same problem with The Hobbit and Bilbo (yes, I’m one of the few who liked the Hobbit movies) but at the end if it, I suspended my disbelief and got over it. I’m sure I can do the same with the Han Solo movie, especially since it’s a NEW STAR WARS MOVIE! 🙂 The new actor that played Chewbacca did quite well in TFA. I’m sure it will be great.
IDK, Bilbo had the advantage that he’s SUPPOSED to be an insufferable brat, so having Martin Freeman take the role, while more annoying than Ian Holm, was not entirely inappropriate to the character.
Chewie is harder, because he has to be likable, and that charisma has to show through the suit. Hopefully the new guy will BE Chewie instead just a guy in a suit.
He said KOTCS was worth the 19 year wait too. His opinion doesn’t mean much especially since all evidence points to him doing TFA for the insane payday he got when he was only in a 1/3 of the film.
I liked most of KOTCS. If you take out a few little things like Mutt swinging on the vines, I thought it was a pretty decent movie overall.
They straight up lied on the lack of CG, That thing was as touched up as any of the PT films though I am curious to see what a Lucas free Indy film would be like.
As any of the PT films? That’s a bit far. I don’t remember any scene from TFA looking like this:
http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3061/9959/original.jpg
TFA was the opposite of grandiose
K.
A lot of the jungle was CG as were the temples not to mention just about every animal seen onscreen.
Yes, but there weren’t as many crappy CGI aliens, like in II. And not as many of these shots.
http://cdn-static.denofgeek.com/sites/denofgeek/files/4/73//9tvghyv.jpg
They did have one crappy alien that was bad as any if not worse than anything in the PT though.
Which one?
The Close Encounters knock off one at the end.
Didn’t see that one.
Same skeletal structure. Speilburg hasn’t gotten gone full Lucas but his association with him has rubbed off in the 21st century.
I doubt he gives a shit to be honest.
Chewie’s gonna be in a film about young Han Solo? Weeeellllllll…glad you’re here to tell us these things! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUo8x2M2qBc
Oh. And don’t forget friggin’ LANDO. I’m serial here, people!
Lando better be in this Han Solo movie or I might not watch it
Be honest with your self….You’ll watch it no matter what.
well I might not watch it in the theater then. it would be the first Star Wars movie I didn’t see in the cinema.
Okay, fair enough, l’am not to enthusiastic about this movie either.
it’s the first time I’ve ever felt a movie set in the Galaxy Far Far Away was a really bad idea.
Can anything stop this from happening at this point? Just a movie that really doesn’t need to be made.
I don’t think so.
I’m not too sure of this Blade Runner sequel either.
Ditto.
This was a given, but it’s nice to have it confirmed.
That being said…isn’t it a little odd that a grown male Wookie who’s aged a couple hundred years want to hang out with a young Cornelian boy? I mean, we got a name for that here, and it ain’t pretty. 😉
Not sure he ever really wanted to, Was kind of pressured into it by his culture.
At least him being played by a younger actor will make sense now. I find it more interesting that the spinoffs will be marketed differently though.
“And then there’ll be POSSIBLY be more thereafter.”
Right…maybe there won’t be. Maybe DIsney will just say: “You know what…that’s enough Star Wars for while. Let’s give it a rest for now.”
Lol man hilarious joke.
confirming Chewbacca will be part of the Han Solo movie is like confirming Alfred will be in a Batman movie
Not a big surprise lol