New Rogue One: A Star Wars Story “Together” TV Spot + New Promo Art!


The official Star Wars Youtube channel has just revealed new Rogue One TV Spot, featuring a few brief new scenes and some extended ones. Also  StarWarsUK revealed new promo art from the movie. Check it out…






Here are a few screenshots from the TV spot:


rogue-one-01 rogue-one-02 rogue-one-03 rogue-one-04 rogue-one-05 rogue-one-06



Also the official Star Wars UK Twitter account revealed two super cool art pieces from the movie:


cwljenvwiaayavl cwli3_vxcain6m7



Website | + posts

Founder of SWNN, MNN and The Cantina forums.

Born on April 24, 1980.

Val Trichkov (Viral Hide)

Founder of SWNN, MNN and The Cantina forums.Born on April 24, 1980.

52 thoughts on “New Rogue One: A Star Wars Story “Together” TV Spot + New Promo Art!

  • November 6, 2016 at 5:23 pm

    Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Hmmm..

    Rogue One: X-Wing Porn.

    Yeah. I’m okay with this.

  • November 6, 2016 at 6:17 pm

    K-2SO is going to get all rusty if he keeps running in water like that

    • November 7, 2016 at 12:14 pm

      Perhaps he’s made out of recycled stainless-steel saucepans. He might also be non-stick.

  • November 6, 2016 at 7:45 pm

    Anyone seen the official poster in stores yet?

    • November 6, 2016 at 10:38 pm

      No, but I did see it in my local theater and freaked out.

  • November 6, 2016 at 8:18 pm


  • November 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm


    Mmmm, just made me imagine Rooney Mara in this instead of Felicity Jones. Upgrade!

    • November 6, 2016 at 9:08 pm

      To be honest, I don’t think this would make such a big of a difference. Both look quite similar to each other, both are good actresses and both were nominated for an Oscar. Besides, more recent promotional materials from that film show that Jyn can EXPRESS EMOTIONS, so when we get to the film, she will finally act like a well-rounded human being. 😉

      • November 6, 2016 at 9:20 pm

        Oh I meant I’d prefer Mara in terms of looks 😉

        Yeah, it’ll be interesting to see if her character is capable of displaying any emotion at all. K-2SO has seemed more human than her in the marketing so far.

  • November 6, 2016 at 8:33 pm

    Stay on target…

  • November 6, 2016 at 8:57 pm

    The Empire had the right idea building the Death Star above the Club Med planet. Kick back on the beach, work on your tan and sip a pina colada while your crew builds the ultimate power of terror in the universe.

    • November 7, 2016 at 2:29 am

      Empire don’t surf.

    • November 7, 2016 at 7:25 pm

      Galen Erso: “Worry about the rum, dear friends, not the exhaust port.”

  • November 6, 2016 at 9:13 pm

    Oh I meant I’d prefer Mara in terms of looks 😉

    Yeah, it’ll be interesting to see if her character is capable of displaying any emotion at all. K-2SO has seemed more human than her in the marketing so far.

  • November 6, 2016 at 10:37 pm

    It has begun….

  • November 7, 2016 at 1:13 am

    No Darth Vader on the TV spot? Wow kiss a couple of MILLIONS away at the Box Office guys……

    • November 7, 2016 at 1:21 am

      Huh? He’s in the first shot.

      • November 7, 2016 at 2:22 am

        Not that I’m worried about how much money Rogue One will make, but half of the back of Vader’s helmet at the edge of the picture for less than two seconds doesn’t really count. If you don’t know to look for it, you won’t see it.

        • November 7, 2016 at 3:32 am

          Right – your “average casual TV viewer” will not know that blurry upside down reflection is Vader.

          • November 7, 2016 at 12:10 pm

            Your average casual tv viewer won’t be swayed to see it based on seeing Vader or not.

          • November 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm

            Actually they will be. Your “average casual viewer” is susceptible to iconography that they recognize – which is why every Spider Man movie does well even when they are horrid.

          • November 12, 2016 at 3:06 am

            You underestimate the intelligence of the average viewer.

    • November 7, 2016 at 5:07 am

      You think you know marketing better than Disney? HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

      • November 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm

        Disney is great at Marketing, but they aren’t perfect. And I know Darth Vader (the most recognizable & popular villain on Planet Earth) has more Emotional-Equity & Box Office “draw” then Krennic or any other new bad-guy. Fact, period, and end of discussion.

        • November 7, 2016 at 8:23 pm

          No, not the end of discussion. Because LFL and Disney are privy to things that you and I, a couple of morons online, aren’t.

          And one of those things is how much is Vader in the film. And if he isn’t in it for anything substantial, centering the marketing around him would then piss people off and make them feel misled. Remember they didn’t show Luke in the marketing for TFA and people were going insane and then, lo and behold, we find out they had a good reason.

          They are playing the long game of not misleading people and potentially turning off customers to their future movies rather than make a small short-term gain.



          Discussion continues because you don’t get to say when it ends just because you disagree.

          • November 7, 2016 at 8:39 pm

            If Vader does not have a substantial presence in the Film, this is a severely lost opportunity. Seeing Vader at the height of his Imperial-Reign is something fans have dreamed about for decades. I’ll take Vader over the generic-Krennic ANY day — I know the vast majority of viewers would as well —- and I know the fan-excitement to see Vader on the big-screen again eclipses any other BadGuy in this film. More Vader in the Film = More Box Office. If they “screw us” with like 2 seconds of Vader, the film will do well, but won’t reach the heights it certainly could.

          • November 8, 2016 at 3:12 am

            “If Vader does not have a substantial presence in the Film, this is a severely lost opportunity.”

            This is a severely premature statement until you see the movie and know the story. Making a movie from the POV of “We need Vader in it” is a poor way to tell a story. Shoveling in more Vader for more money is exactly what they aren’t doing.

            And I for one am glad for that.

            Tell good stories, don’t wank the fans with service. The right people are in charge.

          • November 8, 2016 at 5:07 am

            Treating Vader as a cameo is insulting to the Vader legacy. I agree – a good story is key but also using the right “ingredients” is key as well — and Vader is worth far more than a cameo — especially in a story about his favorite hangout: The Death Star. Its like making a film about Dagobah and being like “oh yeah there this one little green dude in a hole that we will show for 2 minutes.”

          • November 8, 2016 at 5:26 am

            I am not concerned with box office as I am with a good story and shoehorning Vader in is equally negligent, overtly contrived and you don’t know if it involves him intimately.

            We will talk after the movie. Too many unknowns

          • November 8, 2016 at 11:48 pm

            I’m saying if a movie about the Death Star doesn’t involve a good chunk of Vader – it is negligent. But yes – like yourself – I am hoping for a great movie.

  • November 7, 2016 at 3:57 am

    I called it! New Star Wars movie this December! I KNEW IT!!!!

    • November 7, 2016 at 10:12 am


    • November 7, 2016 at 2:43 pm

      Oh wise and mighty WackyBantha, we implore you to tell us who will win the election tomorrow. (so I can call my bookie).

      • November 7, 2016 at 9:53 pm

        Re: “tell us who will win the election tomorrow.”

        I can’t tell you who will win, but I CAN tell you who will lose:
        The American People

        • November 9, 2016 at 10:26 am

          Ahahahahaha. President Trump! Enjoy all of our celebrity rejects who will be moving to Canada, lol.

      • November 8, 2016 at 12:17 am

        the empire shall rise tomorrow. we are going to build a death star and make the rebels pay for it.

  • November 7, 2016 at 4:27 am

    Bang, I just saw the ad on Sunday Night Football, right after reading this article. It’s 95% the same, but it finally feels like we’re getting to just normal ads for Rogue One, not “premiere” of a trailer.
    Still down about the news that there will not be an opening crawl…makes me wonder what else will be missing in the movie.

    • November 7, 2016 at 5:07 am

      Don’t be down. Be happy it will be a new experience.

    • November 7, 2016 at 9:52 pm

      Re: “makes me wonder what else will be missing in the movie”

  • November 7, 2016 at 7:57 am

    This seriously has a chance to be the best Star Wars movie thus far, even story wise, cause nostalgia will kick ASS and we see the story that LED to Luke fulfilling his journey, and what LED to Anakin Skywalker fulfilling HIS destiny, bringing balance to the force. This story, not relying on a force user (first time ever) holds so much weight, and the cast is outstanding, without question imo, will be the best acting in a Star Wars movie overall (something the spinoffs I think, will take advantage of)

    Nothing will ever top the nostalgia, and the impact TFA gave me, for the first big step in a everlasting Star Wars universe, the return, and also the launch, of a brand new Star Wars, but I dont think ive ever been more excited for a Star Wars movie.. since even Episode 1. This movie looks like it will be amazing

  • November 7, 2016 at 12:12 pm

    I think it would be really cool (and I think I might be alone here) if it turned out that Jyn’s father left out a vital component in the Death Star weapon so that when it was fired instead of shooting out the beam, it would destroy the whole Death Star- which would be the real reason it exploded the second they were about to shoot at Yavin IV.

    • November 7, 2016 at 2:03 pm

      No. I liked where you were going right until the end. I think it would be cool that he’s the reason for the exposed exhaust port, but to cheapen what Luke pulls off in the ORIGINAL FILM?

      No. No. No.

      • November 8, 2016 at 7:21 pm

        Right. I thought this was where he was going with it. And this would be controversial enough, but maybe if there was some light implication that leaves the door open to the idea that it was sabotaged, that would be clever. Don’t want to sell it too much as a retcon or “fix” for the kind of silly idea of the port in general.

        But obviously not just the idea that it self destructed regardless of the attack.

    • November 7, 2016 at 2:04 pm

      Not only does that not work for the reason stated above, how in the world do you explain the successful destruction of Alderaan?

      • November 7, 2016 at 2:46 pm

        Didn’t think of that. It was a tongue-in-cheek comment anyway, as it would pretty much negate Luke’s entire presence in the original film. I was thinking along the lines of the parody movie where the engineer drops a spanner into the weapon chamber which blows up the station.

    • November 7, 2016 at 6:40 pm

      No No No No No No No. We are NOT going to “UNDO” the heroic efforts of Luke Skywalker. Period and end of discussion.

  • November 7, 2016 at 2:17 pm

    Rogue One TV spot number 1. And counting…

    • November 7, 2016 at 2:48 pm

      only a second or two of new footage though. Honestly at this stage I’d probably just as soon not watch any new clips until I’ve seen the film anyway.

  • November 7, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    OK, I saw this during football last night and wondered if my mind might be playing a little trick on me so I waited until the AM (slept it off LOL) and re-watched just to be sure. Does anyone else think Jyn has a very slightly different look in some of her scenes? I’m talking about the makeup, hair, etc and not in a bad way 🙂
    Like when she’s speaking to Saw, the rogue group, etc. Heck, her accent might be a little different too but tell me guys, is this just my imagination or could we be seeing some of those not-so-controversial reshoots in this ‘new’ clip? Whatdya’ think???

    • November 7, 2016 at 5:23 pm

      Haven’t watched yet but I’d agree that if anything seems slightly different it would more than likely be the case that it was due to some of the scenes added in the reshoots that occured. No biggie though. My main question for the film is if I remember correctly the first trailer we got featured Saw w/ no hair, but the newer ones he has a head full of it. I wonder if this is actually meant to be a part of the film and just a large amount of time passes even though both scenes we saw w/ varying hair were in the same location.. or if due to the reshoots they decided to scrap the no hair idea and go w/ hair. Ultimately it doesn’t really matter w/ respect to the story I just was wondering if its indicative of a large amount of time passing or they just changed the hair (as I’m African-American and I know how long it takes to grow out hair to that extent lol)

      • November 10, 2016 at 1:40 pm

        The action figure has Saw with a full head of hair. Also Whitaker appears (to me at least) a bit thinner in the footage of him where he has a full head of hair.

        My theory (just my theory) is that they decided to reshoot and/or shoot additional footage of Saw. But when they got back together for the new shoots, Whitaker had lost weight and grown out his hair. So they elected to reshoot all of his footage, and just have him keep his hair.

        Can’t wait to see the movie to find out! 🙂

Comments are closed.